<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Line Operation Latest Topics</title><link>https://forum-v4.signalsoft.info/forum/288-line-operation/</link><description>Line Operation Latest Topics</description><language>en</language><item><title>Pausing during LineOps</title><link>https://forum-v4.signalsoft.info/topic/8665-pausing-during-lineops/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Is it possible to pause the game during LineOps?
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Kev
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">8665</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 12:21:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Does Anyone Still Use Line Operations?</title><link>https://forum-v4.signalsoft.info/topic/8623-does-anyone-still-use-line-operations/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Having not run any sims with Line Operations since switching PC's two years ago, I installed the Line Operations Supervisor onto my current PC yesterday. Port tests come back successful on ports 55385, 55386 and 55387, but so far (last night and periodically today) I've not seen anyone dispatching with Line Operations. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The question I have is this, do people still use Line Operations, or have I maybe not set something up correctly which is preventing me seeing any bring run?
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Regards,
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Phil.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">8623</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 16:17:41 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Multiple instances of Supervisor.exe without changing Ports?</title><link>https://forum-v4.signalsoft.info/topic/2845-multiple-instances-of-supervisorexe-without-changing-ports/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	<span>@Charlie or Richard:</span>
</p>

<p>
	I have a suggestion to the Supervisor.exe. The programe allows to start multiple instances. But if you try to oberve multiple lines at the same time you have to use another port because the first instance reserves the port exclusiv.
</p>

<p>
	But it seems, that it would be no problem for the protocol to support multiple instances, because it is UDP. And there are no datas received that need to be hidden from other processes.
</p>

<p>
	My suggestion is to try out if it may help to set the property UdpClient.ExclusiveAddressUse to false. You may catch this seperate because it is not fatal if this fails. You may also replace the constructors with parameters with the constructor without parameters and call UdpClient.Connect(...) instead (maybe before or likely after setting ExclusiveAddressUse).
</p>

<p>
	If this helps to open multiple Supervisor.exe without changing the receive ports I would suggest to do that. (But I'm not sure so you better test before.)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Gleissperre
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2845</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 17:36:36 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
